Finnish Judicial System under Political Pressure

The Russian mother of the kidnapped Russian child Anton Rimma Salonen has appealed to the Supreme Court contesting her verdict passed by the Court of Appeal. 

Rimma Salonen is convinced that Finnish judicial system is under strong political pressure. Russian boy Anton was violently kidnapped in Russia from his mother by the group of people, including the boy’s Finnish father, who is now under criminal investigation.

After the kidnapping Anton was being kept in the Finnish consulate for several weeks and then smuggled to Finland in the trunk of the diplomatic car with the help of the former Finnish consul Simo Pietilainen, who is also under criminal investigation, on 8 May 2009.

Soon after the incident 14.5.2009 in the public TV interview Finnish Foreign Minister Alexander Stubb defended the illegal actions of Finnish diplomats regarding the abduction and smuggling of the child stating that Finnish diplomats acted “correctly, legally and humanely”. Finnish Foreign Minister also stressed that the father of the boy was his legal guardian and implied that the child’s Russian mother was the culprit even before any charges were pressed against the boy’s mother Rimma Salonen. So Finnish Foreign Minister Alexander Stubb has demonstrated his contempt towards the Finnish Court acting as a judge himself deciding on the fate of the child, passing the guilty-verdicts and taking the legal decisions in his own hands.

Due to the above mentioned statements of Finnish Foreign Minister the case against Rimma Salonen was already confirmed even before the official charges. Up to the present moment in the case of Rimma Salonen Finnish judicial system hasn’t demonstrated any independence from the political decisions. The mother has received the guilty-verdicts even without any strong evidence against her. The only argument against the mother is that she dared to travel with her son to Russia, which was automatically classified as kidnapping, though when travelling the mother was also the boy’s legal guardian.

In Finland the child has been separated from his Russian mother, but hardly the boy’s feelings are of any concern to the Finnish “Supreme judge” Foreign Minister Alexander Stubb.

Blackmailing Russia

At the St. Petersburg press conference 9.12.2010 prominent Finnish human rights activist PhD Johan Bäckman raised the issue of human rights violations in Finland. Johan Bäckman suggests that Finland is blackmailing Russia with children by keeping Russian children hostage. In Finland during a very short period of time Russian children have been taken away from their Russian parents by Finnish authorities. At the conference Russian mothers tell their heartbreaking stories – families torn apart, children deprived of their parents by authorities, moral abuse as well as national and religious discrimination.    

http://antifasistit.blogspot.com/2010/12/blog-post_10.html

Almost 2 years ago, Russian boy Anton Salonen, a citizen of Russian Federation, was violently kidnapped from his mother in Russia and with the support of the Finnish diplomats illegally hidden in the Finnish consulate in St. Petersburg for a month, and then the child was smuggled in the trunk of the Finnish diplomatic car across the border.

Immediately after that country's leadership, denying the Russian citizenship of Anton, blamed Russia, which has not acceded to the Hague Convention on child abduction. Finnish Foreign Minister Alexander Stubb said referring to the abduction and smuggling of the Russian boy Anton that Finnish diplomats had acted “correctly, legally and humanely”.

Doctor Bäckman informs that in Finland Anton Salonen has been subjected to the process of de-Russification: Finnish authorities forbade him to speak his native Russian language, to meet with his Russian mother, denied the boy’s Russian citizenship, banned the child from all ties with the Orthodox religion, took away his cross, and against his mother Rimma Salonen was fabricated a criminal case. According to Finnish authorities citizen of Russia being the child’s legal guardian did not have the right to go to Russia with her son. Anton’s mother Rimma Salonen has been blackmailed and given ultimatums in order to silence her.

Finnish human rights activist is convinced that while the Finnish authorities continue to put pressure on Russia with the requirement to sign the Hague Convention, Anton Salonen is virtually held hostage by the Finnish government. He is guarded by Finnish security services, local police must know the whereabouts of the boy at any moment, Mother Rimma has the right to meet with him only twice a month for 2-3 hours under the supervision of intelligence services, police and social workers, including police cars, and even a helicopter. Communicating in Russian has been strictly prohibited (though starting from November under the pressure of Russian authorities the interpreter has been provided to interpret for the guards, so the mother and the child could communicate in their native language – Russian). In an interesting way the future of certain members of the Finnish government, many of whom were directly involved in the realization of illegal actions regarding the abduction and trafficking of Anton from Russia to Finland, depends on this child.

Finnish authorities and journalists persistently try to hide the fact that former Finnish diplomat Simo Pietiläinen, who smuggled the child, as well as the father of Anton Paavo Salonen are under criminal investigation (see  http://evgeniahj.blogspot.com/2010/11/lapsikaappaus-suomeen.html). Disclosed information suggests that Anton might face deportation to Norway so that his half-brother (Paavo Salonen’s eldest son) could become Anton’s legal guardian. Johan Bäckman assumes that apparently in Norway, the secret services would be able to protect the child more effectively from the Orthodox cross and the love of his Russian mother.
  

In the case of Valentina Putkonen Finnish authorities without a court decision deported Valentina’s daughter Julia (Julia Putkonen) to Russia to the girl’s Finnish father, although in the Salonen's case a trip to Russia was almost automatically recognized as a serious criminal offense. Valentina Putkonen’s daughter is also being isolated from the Orthodox faith, can meet with her mother only once in 2 months for 2 hours, without permission to speak Russian, and in the presence of Finnish social workers. According to Johan Bäckman, Julia Putkonen is now also held hostage by the Finnish government in Kaayani (Northern Finland) at her grandmother’s place. Thus, the Finnish authorities have deprived the girl of both parents.

Julia Putkonen, an innocent girl, wishes to receive only 1 Christmas gift - to meet with her mother. But doctor Bäckman suspects that the girl’s destiny is to be held hostage by the Finnish government, which blackmails Russia to sign the Hague Convention.

Almost miraculous seems to be the story of Russian boy Robert Rantala, who was taken away from his parents to the orphanage. After the visit of the Russian ombudsman Pavel Astakhov to Finland Robert Rantala was able to return to his family. But the Finnish authorities continued proceedings against Robert’s Russian mother Inga Rantala, who escaped with her child to St. Petersburg in the summer 2010, where Robert has already started school. Johan Bäckman points out that among the Russian children-hostages in Finland Robert is still the only one who has been liberated.

”The well-known cases of Robert Rantala, Anton Salonen, Julia Putkonen and other Russian children-hostages suggest that Finnish authorities use children as a new weapon of information warfare. By means of bullying and serious violations of human rights of Russian children and their parents, Finland, in violation of international conventions and its own laws, shows Russia that it is entitled to all sorts of things, while Russia has not signed the Hague Convention on child abduction. This is blackmail and extortion, and it is well known that in these cases Finland itself violates international conventions and its own laws.”

The Russian side is being taking certain measures in order to release the innocent children and to protect the lives and health of its citizens.

Russia and WikiLeaks

Western media often tries to present the current political situation in Russia as an ongoing struggle between the groups of two political leaders – President Dmitri Medvedev and Prime-minister Vladimir Putin. According to the documents published by the famous WikiLeaks American diplomats describe the relationship between Putin and Medvedev as the hierarchy of Batman and Robin.

When asked about the mentioned above reference Vladimir Putin answered in his interview given to CNN’s Larry King:

“Well, you know when Mr Medvedev and I were considering how to structure our relations and how to run the election campaign, the 2008 presidential election campaign, we were very well aware that many would try to create a split in our common approach to the building of the Russian state and the development of our economy. Because our interaction is a considerable factor in the country’s domestic policy. But it did not occur to us that it would be done in such an impudent, brazen and aggressive fashion.
Such claims of course are aimed at insulting one of us, at damaging our sense of pride and at provoking us into taking steps that would destroy our effective interaction in running the country. I have to tell you that we have already grown used to this. I urge all those who are engaged in such attempts to calm down.”

(Video interview and transcript of the TV interview Prime Minister Vladimir Putin gave to CNN’s Larry King are available on the Prime Minister’s site.)

Larry King also asked Russia’s Prime Minister about the leak of diplomatic correspondence published by the WikiLeaks group?

Vladimir Putin: “Some experts believe that somebody is deliberately “inflating” WikiLeaks. Building up the site’s authority in order to use it to further their political ends. That is one possible theory, and this is the opinion of experts, which has some currency in our country too. I think that if this is not the case, it shows that the diplomatic service should be more careful with its documents. Such leaks have happened before, in the previous era. I don’t see it as any kind of catastrophe.”


The phenomenon of WikiLeaks should be examined thoroughly. Russia’s main TV channel (TV1) offers its political analysis provided by prominent experts, who suggest WikiLeaks being a CIA project. The main figure of WikiLeaks Julian Assange seems to be a person from nowhere, who has constantly been moving from one place to another. It sounds quite ridiculous, that several governments try to arrest Assange, but can’t succeed. Information published by WikiLeaks doesn’t really contain any revelations, the statistics on wars is controversial: the numbers of casualties are even smaller than the official statistics suggests.

http://www.1tv.ru/news/leontiev/166201

The promotion of WikiLeaks by western mass media looks suspicious, too. WikiLeaks is somehow portrayed as the Voice of Truth and kind of impartial referee, but in fact it seems to be a special project designed by one of the major political players to serve the player's particular interests.

Setting Deadlines for Abolishing Visas between Russia and the EU

A few days ago former Finnish consul Simo Pietilainen, who smuggled the Russian boy Anton from Russia to Finland in the trunk of his diplomatic car and who is declared persona non-grata in Russia and is suspected of several crimes, published his blog on the subject of assumed threat concerning allegedly increasing child kidnapping to Russia, should visas be abolished.

http://simopietilainen.puheenvuoro.uusisuomi.fi/52650-viisumivapaus-ja-lapsikaappaukset

On the case of former diplomat Pietilainen and child kidnapping from Russia:

http://evgeniahj.blogspot.com/2010/11/what-is-finnish-foreign-ministry-afraid.html

http://evgeniahj.blogspot.com/2010/11/lapsikaappaus-suomeen.html

http://juhamolari.blogspot.com/2010/10/toistaiseksi-syyton-simo-lauri.html

The same person, who smuggled the child from Russia, suggests that abolishing visas between RF and EU should be possible only if Russia joins the Hague convention regarding child custody issues.

Such “proposals” reveal the concern of certain parties, that ethnic Russians might leave EU countries for Russia with their children. This in turn testifies to the fact that economic situation in Europe is not expected to improve any time soon.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in his article “Russia and Europe: From an Analysis of Crisis Lessons to a New Partnership Agenda” published in the Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper, urges the EU to set deadlines for abolishing visas.

http://government.ru/eng/docs/13088/

 “A true partnership on our continent is impossible as long as there are barriers in the way of personal and business contacts.
The most important of these is the visa regime between Russia and the EU. We believe that the abolition of visas should come at the beginning of hands-on integration between Russia and the EU, rather than its completion.
Freedom to travel will benefit young people above all, school and university students. They will have more opportunities to go abroad, study and get to know unique cultures of different countries.
By abolishing visas, we also will remove a serious obstacle to the expansion of business. Visas create no problems for large companies today, but for small and mid-sized businesses and innovation companies they pose a serious obstacle. In effect, they artificially freeze the current structure of our economic ties, which is far from perfect.
Finally, deadlines and schedules for abolishing visas will re-energise cooperation between law enforcement agencies of our countries. It will allow them to deal more effectively with illegal migration, drug trafficking, organised crime and terrorism.
So far, the prospects for this initiative remain uncertain since law enforcement bodies lack sufficient incentive to resolve the technical issues involved in going over to a visa-free environment.”

The Future of Russia-NATO Relations

At the NATO summit in Lisbon the Alliance adopted a new doctrine according to which Russia is NOT considered to be an enemy of the western military bloc any more, but a partner. This is a totally new approach.

NATO also offered Russia the participation in the European ABM project. Russian president Dmitri Medvedev has cautiously accepted the offer.

“We have agreed with our NATO partners that we will pursue dialogue on the European ABM. Our main guide here should be that our participation ought to be equal and I will stress this – it can only be as partners,” Medvedev said. “No other form of participation for the sake of appearance is acceptable. Either we participate fully – we exchange information, take part in decision-making – or we do not participate at all.”

Russian military and political experts assess that NATO needs Russia more than Russia needs NATO.

Russian experts also view NATO as a weak alliance, whose existence nowadays is questionable and purpose outdated.

http://rt.com/politics/nato-russia-summit-cooperation/

“What does NATO offer Russia, and what does Russia get in reality? Would Russia be willing to help NATO stay afloat by participating in its projects? What is the price of improving relations with its Western partners?

Military expert Aleksandr Khramchikhin thinks that the threat that Iran and North Korea allegedly pose, which is often discussed by supporters of Russia-NATO relations becoming closer, is a myth. He estimates the combat and political state of the alliance as low and does not see Russia in this bloc.
------------------------------

Aleksandr Khramchikhin

- military and political expert, Deputy Director of Military and Political Analytical Institute
- graduated from Moscow State University
- in 1990’s worked for Boris Yeltsin’s election campaign, as well as for election campaign of parties Our Home – Russia and Union of Right Forces
------------------------------

RT: NATO summits happen regularly, but there were no suggestions  before to have a joint missile shield with Russia. Dmitry Rogozin, Russia’s envoy  to NATO, says that the idea of involving Russia in NATO projects has never been popular; on the contrary, there was a tendency to exclude Russia. Why does NATO want to involve Russia in its projects now?

AK: NATO is clearly looking for a raison d'etre. The organization has been looking for it since 1991, when the enemy it was created to fight against ceased to exist. Until recently, eastward expansion was deemed as the only purpose for NATO's existence. It was sort of a goal in itself. But now the project is obviously no longer relevant. It brings more problems than benefits. So the next and the only existing option is to involve Russia. Unless this project gets underway in the nearest future, they will have to dissolve NATO.

RT: Why should Russia help NATO stay afloat by participating in its projects?

AK: Actually, I do not quite understand myself why Russia should participate in this. Of course, it would be useful for Russia to develop closer ties with NATO, if it provided real protection from China, because China is surely the main threat to us. But it’s obvious that at the moment NATO is in such a condition that it cannot provide any kind of protection from anything. It’s just unable to do it. That’s why it’s absolutely unclear why we should participate in projects which have no effect.

RT: Those who are trying to pull Russia into a joint missile defense project claim there will be a shield to protect both Russia and Europe from Iran and North Korea. But do these countries pose any threat to Russia and Europe? 

AK: As for North Korea, the idea is so absurd that there is nothing to comment on. I don’t even know who would buy it. How can NATO protect Russia from North Korea? North Korea is in the Far East, and NATO is in Europe.
I don’t see how Iran can be a threat either. Firstly, Iran can’t mass-produce even conventional intermediate-range missiles, let alone missiles with nuclear warheads. And secondly, even if Iran gets such missiles, I have no clue as to why Iran should suddenly attack Russia or Europe.

The Iranian threat is nothing but an artificial geopolitical invention. And the threat coming from North Korea is sheer nonsense.

RT: Is there a possibility that perhaps NATO is talking about cooperation and joint projects in order to ruin Russian-Iranian relations and get Russia involved in a war with Iran?

AK: That is true to some extent. But that’s not the main thing. The main thing is that Russia is being involved in a NATO project on NATO’s terms. In other words, we start doing something we are not interested in, while NATO gets a new raison d’etre. NATO gets more funds – a lot more, and NATO bureaucrats roll in money again.

RT: What does Russia expect to receive from the deal? Russia is still only considering the offer and expects certain compromises. What are they?

AK: As far as I understand, we won’t get anything in return. All we get is a more confident relationship with the West, which is not bad, but that’s not enough.

RT: But there is some bargaining going on. For example, Russia hopes the United States will reconsider its plan to deploy a missile defense system in Europe.

AK: I don’t know what is there to change. So far, there is no missile shield in Europe. So, there is nothing to change. There is a project which has already been completely changed. Bush had one project, and now Obama has an altogether different project. However, in reality nothing has been done, and now the project is under discussion again. So, if Russia joins it, that will be a different project again.

RT: What is the purpose of the military reform which is currently conducted in Russia? Closer cooperation with NATO?

AK: No, the purpose of the military reform, if there is one, has nothing to do with cooperation. In fact, we never expected to have military cooperation with anybody. We don’t cooperate with anybody. We don’t have any real allies. We should clearly realize that.
Military reforms are always launched in connection with some events outside the country, because armed forces exist to counter external threats. The purpose of the current reform is not cooperation, especially with NATO, because it started after the war with Georgia when Russia-NATO relations were at their worst.

RT: What about the upcoming reform of NATO? Can Russia benefit from it? 

AK: There aren't enough details so far and NATO hasn’t adopted its new concept yet.

RT: Why do some Russian politicians and experts advocate closer ties with NATO? What is their rationale?

AK: I repeat, hypothetically this cooperation could be a great advantage, if NATO could protect us from China. The problem with the people who make such statements is that they have no idea what NATO actually is. They continue to think of NATO as of a very well-organized political and military alliance the way it was in the Cold War times. And thus the majority of our people, including Kremlin officials, think NATO to be a terrible threat, while a small number of people, such people as Igor Yurgens, for example, think that, on the contrary, NATO is our protection and ally.

In reality, NATO is anything but a powerful and well-organized politico-military force. It is a purely bureaucratic structure, which has lost its raison d’etre and, what’s more important, its military potential. That’s why it doesn’t pose any threat, but neither can it be a good ally.

RT: How did Russia benefit from participating in such summits?

AK: There was no benefit, because in 99 percent of the cases summits of this kind are nothing but a talking shop.

RT: Russia’s relationship with Belarusian leader Lukashenko has taken a turn for the worse. What are the chances he might start drifting from Russia towards NATO?

AK: That’s something Lukashenko has long been blackmailing us with. He’s been very active in flirting with the West. But the West can’t accept him for ideological reasons.

RT: Do you think Ukraine has fully abandoned the idea to join NATO?

AK: NATO’s eastward expansion creates more problems than it solves. Having accepted 12 new countries between 1999 and 2009, NATO became much weaker in terms of its military capacity and has become much more difficult to manage. So if they go on and accept countries like Ukraine, which doesn’t have an effective army and where most of the people are against joining NATO, this is going to create even more problems, and perhaps these problems will be even more serious than those caused by the 12 recently-joined members put together.”

What is Finnish Foreign Ministry afraid of?

Recently several blogs concerning the subject of the abducted Russian boy and his citizenship have been removed in Finland. The censorship happens due to the fact that the boy smuggled from Russia by Finnish diplomat Simo Pietilainen (proclaimed in Russia persona non-grata) has a Russian citizenship – the fact Finnish Foreign Ministry is trying to conceal.  
  
http://rt.com/Top_News/2009-05-15/Russia_lashes_out_at_Finland_over_kidnapping.html?fullstory
 

“Russia lashes out at Finland over kidnapping
 Moscow has filed a formal complaint to Helsinki after Finland's consulate general in St. Petersburg helped a Finnish citizen take his son out of Russia against both the will of his Russian mother and the law.
The Finnish Embassy in Russia has confirmed that the incident took place.
… Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov expressed his protest to his Finnish counterpart Alexander Stubb over the incident.

“In the wake of reports that Finnish citizen Paavo Salonen moved his son Anton, a Russian citizen, outside Russia, a protest was conveyed to Alexander Stubb and explanations demanded from the Finnish side. It was stated that the moving out of a child against the will of his mother, a Russian citizen, was a flagrant violation of Russian law, which implies criminal liability,” the Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement posted on Thursday said.”
 
After the incident the boy’s Russian mother followed her son, but was arrested in Finland. She was stripped of her custody and is allowed to see her son only a few hours a month under the supervision of the authorities. The mother and the son are not allowed to use their mother-tongue – Russian language to communicate. They are not allowed to pray either and the boy’s cross was taken off him, though the child was baptised in the Russian Orthodox Church.
 

http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=7222
 
04 May 2010, 12:41
 
“Russian woman's son in Finland is not permitted to pray, his cross was taken off him
 
Helsinki, May 4, Interfax – Finnish social workers forbade 7-year-old Anton, son of the Russian citizen Rimma Salonen, to pray, to make a sign of cross and took an Orthodox cross off him.

"I had a meeting with my son this week. Social workers told me I shouldn't pray with him before lunch as we used to do, we shouldn't make a sign of cross and they also said they had taken off Anton's cross," Salonen told Interfax.
In 2008, after divorcing Finn Paavo Salonen, Russian subject Rimma Salonen took their 5-year old son Anton to the Nizhny Novgorod Region. Several people, including the boy's father, kidnapped the child from Rimma on April 12, 2009. With the help of a Finnish general consulate official in Petersburg, the child was driven from Russia in a boot of the diplomatic car. “ 
No doubt the Russian mother has suffered from the discrimination, and both the mother and the child are victims of the Russophobic policy, conducted by certain political forces in Finland.
 

“Alexander Brod, a Moscow-based human rights activist, who lamented the fact that Finnish authorities turn a blind eye to facts of religious and racial hatred in their country. This is nothing but a violation of all the international norms, Brod stressed: As I see it, the court demonstrates a biased approach to the matter, Brod says, pointing to Friday’s decision to strip the child of an array of freedoms. Needless to say, this is a direct human rights violation, he states.”

 http://english.ruvr.ru/2010/05/02/7210265.html

“ After divorcing her husband in 2008 Rimma Salonen and her five-year-old son Anton returned to Russia. Several months later, the boy’s father abducted the child and with the assistance of a Finnish embassy employee secretly took him out of Russia in a diplomatic car. The high-profile case received extensive media coverage, was discussed at the top levels and caused the Russian Foreign Ministry to file a note of protest. The Finnish judges stayed deaf to the protests. Moreover, they refuse to recognize the boy’s Russian citizenship, even though he has a Russian passport. Human rights activist Alezander Brod says this sort of approach is convenient because a duel citizenship would force the Finnish lawyers to acknowledge that the father had no legal right to take the child out of Russia against his mother’s will. On this assumption the Russian Prosecutor-General’s investigating committee is seeking extradition of Paavo Salonen and lodged the relevant request in October last year. However, instead of cooperation, the Finnish authorities chose to accuse Rimma of child abduction, arrested her when she arrived in Finland to see her son and gave her an 18-month suspended sentence. The entire procedure took just a few days, whereas Rimma’s appeal against the court ruling has been under consideration for six months. As long as she is found guilty, Rimma Salonen cannot count on living with her son or see him without a police escort.”   

Scandal in Finland is gathering pace.
 
It’s high time for the Finnish foreign minister to take responsibility and to draw appropriate conclusions instead of concealing facts, which inevitably leads to repressions, violation of human rights and restrictions regarding freedom of speech.

This kind of foreign policy based on provocations against Russia is not constructive. Yuschenkos’ time is over.

Venäläinen asiantuntija: maailman talouseliitti sanelee Suomen viranomaisille

Suomessa perheinstituutiota käsittelevään konferenssiin osallistunut Venäjän Väestöpoliittisen Turvallisuuden Instituutin johtaja ja maailmankuulu lapsipsykologi Irina Medvedeva kommentoidessaan Anton-tapausta, joka kuumentaa tunteita äärimmilleen (kansainvälisillä nettifoorumeilla jo hyvin voimakasti vaaditaan konkreettisia toimia), toteaa, että Suomen viranomaiset toimivat asiassa poikkeuksellisen epäinhimillisesti eristäen lapsi äidistään maailman talouseliitin käskystä.

Vastaava tapaus on sattunut myös Ranskassa, kun kuuluisalta venäläiseltä näyttelijältä Natalia Zaharovalta vietiin tytär viranomaisten toimesta (perusteluna – ”liiallinen rakkaus” lapseen). Rimma ja Anton Salosen tavoin heitä kiellettiin puhumasta venäjää, risti otettiin pois. Eli täsmälleen sama klisee.

(Tiedotusvälineissä myös korostetaan, että Antonin siirtäminen Venäjältä ja salakuljettaminen Suomeen tapahtui brittiläisen tiedustelupalvelun kaavan mukaan, kun vuonna 1985 CIA:n sisarjärjestö MI6 toteutti agenttinsa Gordijevskin salakuljettamisen Neuvostoliitosta.

http://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oleg_Gordijevski

”Gordijevski sai tiedon KGB:ltä, ettei saisi enää virkaa ulkomailta. Vaikka häntä epäiltiin kaksoisagentiksi, hän sai matkustaa kesäkuussa vuonna 1985 Moskovan asuntoonsa. Vaikka KGB vakoili Gordijevskia, hän sai yhteyden MI6:een, ja britit suunnittelivat hänen pakonsa, jota oli valmisteltu jo monta vuotta hänen ollessaan virassa Lontoossa.
19. heinäkuuta vuonna 1985, Gordijevski meni lenkille Moskovan puistossa kuten tavallista ja onnistui hämäämään KGB:n agentteja ja nousemaan junaan, joka vei hänet Suomen rajalle. Sieltä Britannian suurlähetystön auto salakuljetti hänet rajan yli Suomeen, josta hänet lennätettiin Norjan kautta Englantiin.”)

Irina Medvedeva paljastaa, että oligarkkien tarkoituksena on väestön vähentäminen maailmanlaajuisesti ja ihmisten kontrolloiminen, jolloin perheinstituution tuhoaminen länsimaisen lastensuojelun välityksellä palvelee kyseistä tarkoista. 

Oligarkkien Jumala on mammona, joten Medvedevin mielestä heitä ohjaa ”satanistinen” logiikka. Juuri tämän takia talouseliitin ohjausnuorassa kulkevien suomalaisten viranomaisten ”sadistisia” toimia, jotka on suunnattu äidin ja lapsen kiusaamiseksi, on mahdotonta ymmärtää inhimillisten arvojen pohjalta. Lapsipsykologi määrittelee viranomaisten toimintaa ”nykyaikaiseksi fasismiksi”, jolloin pieneltä lapselta riistetään maailman tärkein ihminen, eli äiti, ”lapsen edun” nimissä. Medvedeva ihmettelee, kuinka viranomaiset voivat leikkiä Jumalaa päättämällä, kuka sopii lapsen äidiksi tai isäksi ja kuka ei.

Medvedevan mielestä kahden eri arvomaailman keskinäinen kampailu on saavuttanut kulminaatiota, koska pahuus ei piiloudu enää verhoiluun, vaan rohkeasti paljastaa itsensä luomalla nurinkuriset arvot. Pinnalliset tuntemukset, intohimot, sodomismi ja irstailu on arkipäiväistetty, erityisesti länsimaissa (”Venäjällä on vielä toivoa.”). Koska Jumala on rakkaus, niin mammonan palvojien perimmäisenä tarkoituksena on tappaa rakkaus ihmisissä – rakkaus lähimmäisiin (äitiin, isään tai lapsiin), rakkaus Jumalaan, jonka tuloksena on kivisydän. Lapsipsykologi arvioi, että äidistään riistetyn pikku- Antonin sydän kivettyy, koska ”muutoin se repeää tuskasta”.

Medvedeva kuitenkin huomauttaa, että kardinaalinen muutos nykyasetelmiin on tulossa.

Irina Medvedevan videohaastattelu:

http://antifasistit.blogspot.com/2010/11/blog-post_02.html

Huomautus. On todella merkillistä, kuinka Rimma ja Anton Salosen tapaus on koskettanut miljoonia ihmisiä ympäri maailmaa (nettifoorumilla on vähän aikaa sitten perustettu tukikanava Rimma Saloselle – jopa Amerikasta saakka ihmiset välittävät tukea Rimmalle). Sekä Suomen että Venäjän valtiojohto on kommentoinut tapausta ja se edelleen pysyy valtiojohdon agendalla.

Entuudestaan suuryleisölle tuntematon köyhä nainen, tavallinen kotiäiti Rimma Salonen, hyvin vaatimaton ihminen on noussut miljoonien ihmisten silmissä rakkauden symboliksi, koska ainoa, mitä häneltä ei ole pystytty riistämään, on usko, toivo ja rakkaus – rakkaus lapsiin, rakkaus Jumalaan.